Select Tractate Abstract Introduction Contents The Error of Hegel The Error of Einstein The Error of Russell The Error of Heidegger The Error of Philosophy Symbiotic Panentheism

---

Tractate 8 : The Error of Einstein (continued)

The relationship existing between the two forms of distance could graphically be demonstrated as:



‘d’ sub ‘f’ is portrayed as existing in three dimensions, however, d sub ‘f’ could just as well be a function of four dimensions:



Zeno purposely deals with the positive real and inadvertently deals with the negative real. Thus Zeno deals with +/- L, +/- W, +/- H, +/- T, +/- D.

Einstein inadvertently deals with the imaginaries, deals with the ‘i’s’, deals with the:

+/- iL, +/- iW, +/- iH, +/- iT, +/- D.

The understanding regarding the existence of positive and negative reals and the positive and negative imaginaries and the understanding of the inter-relationship of such existences is what metaphysics is in essence all about. But metaphysics is more than just an examination and understanding of mathematical complexities; metaphysics is the understanding of the very ‘whole’ of it all, the understanding of +/- ‘B’ and +/- ‘iB’

In actuality we have two graphics existing simultaneously, the real and the ‘real illusion’ which oscillate between being the real and the ‘real illusion’ to being the ‘real illusion’ and the real:



Within the graphic, d sub f represents functional distance found within the physical and d sub a represents non-functional distance found within the abstract. As such we obtain:



We observe we have the same distance but now:



Represents functional distance wrapped in time and:



In other words: One functional unit of distance directly corresponds to one unit of distance, which leads to an infinite number of universes as described by:



Even Epictetus acknowledged a location where distance existed as a non-functional abstraction:
‘…you are infinitely small in terms of space but equal to God in terms of reason.’

The point is: Individuality exists to experience the individuality of each function of distance and each function of time. Individuality builds a single/one location of infinite distant and time implies the ability to travel in an infinite number of directions in terms of time and distance.

The result is the development of one unique/individualistic entity of distance and time. The representation of the single unique entity of infinite time is represented by t/1, infinite segments of time within the whole. The representation of the single unique entity of infinite distance is represented by d/1, infinite segments of distance within the whole.

What is this concept of d/1 and t/1? What is this concept of infinite segments of distance and infinite segments of time existing as a whole?

Time and distance both divided by 1



v = a constant. ‘v’ is a variable in terms of numbers but ‘v’ is a constant in terms of ideas. ‘v’ is a constant in terms of abstractual functionality.

It is in the universe where time and distance are the fabric within which ‘being’, an active action of the present operating upon the future, is sectionalized.



It is the whole (1), the whole abstraction ( the void of time and space) where abstraction is the fabric being sectionalized.



The result is a need for two separate independent yet simultaneously interdependent locations to explain the mathematics of multiplicity and seamlessness.

Knowledge: The universal building block
The universal building block, the primal atom of existence acting as the foundation of the new metaphysical system of ‘being’ being ‘Being’, symbiotic panentheism, becomes intelligible through the understanding that ‘being’ represents multiplicity of knowing, being represents action, process/reality/the universe, and ‘Being’ represents the singularity of knowing/ the whole and where ‘being’, being, and ‘Being’ are forms of ‘knowing’, knowing, and ‘Knowing’.