1. lexapro escitalopram price
  2. lexapro 20 mg best price
  3. lexapro price generic
  4. best generic brand of lexapro
  5. lexapro price canada
  6. lexapro 10 mg cost

Lexapro Generic Brand Names
4-5 stars based on 156 reviews

Lexapro 20mg $170.32 - $0.95 Per pill
Lexapro 20mg $56.77 - $1.89 Per pill



  • Lexapro Indiana
  • Cochran
  • Prnc Frederck
  • Willmar
  • Fort Recovery


Lexapro escitalopram price : 9.76/mg, price: 9.76/mg, citalopram 8.25/mg, price: 8.25/mg, dextroamphetamine price: 8.25/mg, lisdexamfetamine 8.25/mg What is the advantage and disadvantages between these drugs? There are basically only two medications that have been proven effective for managing ADHD: methylphenidate (Ritalin) amphetamine In this article, I will be talking mostly about the side effects of Ritalin, and the side effects of these drugs when combined with the ADHD-related condition. 1. MAOIs Most medical professionals have accepted that drugs like Prozac (fluoxetine) and Wellbutrin (bupropion) decrease the risk of depression and suicide, but they do not work well on ADHD cases. Many doctors do not realize how effective these drugs are for treating symptoms. The only one proven medication that has been effective in treating ADHD symptoms is methylphenidate (Ritalin): Here is a comparison of the side effects for a kid starting on Ritalin. The Ritalin (slightly modified) has a starting dose of 20mg per day. The total dose should end up being 50mg. It can only be sold by doctors in New York, California and Indiana, although they have no prescription required to take it. The "no" pills are ones that say "WARNING: this medication may cause withdrawal symptoms." Ritalin Side Effects The side effects that are mentioned often very serious, and some have deadly outcomes. These are the side effects of Ritalin. I've given a picture of how serious some these side effects can be: If the kid takes medication for 12 Lexapro 20mg $306.57 - $0.85 Per pill hours a day, it can make the brain feel like it is not working right because the dopamine system is not working as normally. This is what a kid that has lost his dopamine system is like. He will not be able to accomplish his goals. However, if they take 4 hours to wake up, they will likely lose their drive. They will probably fall asleep very easily, because most of their energy is spent dealing with the symptoms of drug. For example, if this person was Buy propecia finasteride 1mg a regular student, he would wake up and go to school. He gets up and works out. But if he is taking the medication, might lose his motivation and will disappear. He might not make it to school anymore. This is a very important rule to live by while taking Prozac: you need to focus a lot. If you are sleeping a good amount but are not doing much, this can be pretty bad. is something like sleep deprivation because the brain is trying to fill the pit of depression by sending dopamine in the brain, but you are only sleeping. When the pit gets too big, this has disastrous psychological effects. I've lexapro full price read it is possible to die when taking the drug, so it does have risks, but most buy real lexapro online people do not make Ventolin oral liquid medication it in terms of.

Lexapro is used for treating depression or generalized anxiety disorder.

Lexapro price canada



Alsleben Altdorf bei NürnbergEisenbergLeinfelden-Echterdingen
MiltenbergWasserburg am InnGeisenheim
DoralYumaLexapro Newton Center


Lexapro price rite aid $10.5 million and the last one was $10 million. So what do we know right this minute about the possible deal with Apple. It's not clear exactly what hardware would be included and in what configuration, or if the prices are simply highest bid and a few other details to come. But if true, this could really be a big deal that would change the smartphone manufacturing landscape in this region. [Via TechCrunch, iPhoneInCanada] Derek Carr was back on tape at Raiders training camp on Thursday as the players returned to facility work out for new head coach canadian pharmacy generic viagra Jack Del Rio and his staff. Carr was not practicing at the start of training camp but he didn't hold back when the news surfaced earlier this month that he would be missing time to rehab on a torn ligament in his left thumb. After a slow start to camp, Carr has been showing a lot of progress, although he has a long way to go. He has completed 71 of his 144 pass attempts over the past two games with seven touchdowns and two interceptions. He's completing 60.5 percent of his passes, has a QB Rating of 104.8 and has thrown just 13 passes that traveled 40-plus yards in the air. [BAIR: No problem with Derek Carr not practicing] While Carr was not practicing and backup Matt McGloin has been running with the first team, rookie Derek Carr was back with his teammates at Raiders training camp on Thursday. Carr, who recently signed a six-year, $126.8 million contract that was worth a record $114 per year, is still dealing with a left thumb injury, but the Oakland Raiders are not panicking. Carr is in a recovery escitalopram price vs lexapro process and Lexapro 20mg $238.44 - $0.88 Per pill is expected to return action. His absence will mean less passing play with rookie QB Derek Carr, who was expected to be the No. 1 QB for Raiders this season, taking Derek Carr's spot in the starting lineup. It's something that he could never have fudged out of. Follow @LeviDamien After having his best week of 2015 with two touchdowns, running back Reggie Bush was asked if he's going to be in the Hall of Fame. "A few," he said Wednesday, via ESPN.com. "It's certainly no longer a question of whether I'll be in the Hall of Fame. I don't think it will be a question of if I'm in. "A little more likely then probably a little more likely." Bush had 18 times for 161 yards and two touchdowns in Oakland's 38-34 overtime win over Chicago in Week 11. He also added six receptions for 46 yards and a score. "A few months ago," Bush said, "I was like, 'I don't know if I'm going to make it.' I was thinking about it very seriously." The only reason Bush didn't join Frank Gore, Terrell Owens and Steve Largent in the Hall of Fame was due to his role in the "Monday Night Game" which featured him running the punt back 80 yards for a touchdown in the playoffs. But he has shown why should be in the NFL All-Decade Team and why his teammates, coaches teammates who aren't named Cris Carter should consider this an important time in his career. Bush wasn't even in the Raiders roster last year when the team made Super Bowl XLIII. The federal government has announced plans to reduce its investment in the national broadband network and reallocate $10.28 billion to other projects. Communications Minister Malcolm Turnbull made the announcement on Monday morning as part of the government's new policy on infrastructure. The National Broadband Network project will receive $1.9 billion in savings and $1.95 transferred to infrastructure that will not deliver high speed internet, his office said. This includes a $900 million savings to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, which is the principal authority on broadband in Australia, and a $1.8 billion reduction in the Commonwealth Grants Commission's operations budget. The savings will allow government to take on debt over the next four years – but Turnbull said this increase would not Alternative to finasteride for hair loss be funded from within existing spending. The cuts will also see government delay the release of $1.4 billion in planned funding until 2019, Turnbull said. He said the government would also allocate $1.05 billion to the National Broadband Network Corporation, which was created in 2007 to provide the network infrastructure and operate network. But he said the corporation "does not need additional funding – the NBN is a cost-effective, efficient project that Tretinoin cream buy canada is delivering broadband to businesses, schools, hospitals and homes". Nuisance charges are intended to impose sanctions on conduct that poses a significant risk to the health, safety and welfare of the public.

  1. Amlodipine atorvastatin cost
  2. Cialis 5 mg buy in australia
  3. Buy dapoxetine usa
  4. Where can i buy zovirax ointment online
  5. Kamagra oral jelly günstig kaufen deutschland


  1. generic levitra canada pharmacy
  2. generic lexapro brands
  3. is generic lexapro the same as brand
  4. online pharmacy degree in canada
  5. online pharmacy school in canada


< Generic brand for tobradex :: Cialis generika genauso gut >


Tractate 3 : The Error of Boethius (continued)

Determinism:
Present day perception:

When the doctrine holds that not only mans eventual disposition but every event of his life is predestined, the position is identical to a special kind of determinism (Dictionary of Philosophy and Religion, William L. Reese, 1980.)

Within an Aristotelian system, the statement is absolute not only in terms of what it implies but in terms of what it so succinctly states. As such, no more need be said regarding present day perceptions of determinism.

The new perception:
To best understand the concept of determinism as it applies to a perception of singular location composed of subsets, a diagram once again will be the best manner to initiate the discussion. This diagram may look familiar, as it well should by now, but the dialogue boxes are now filled with the four forms of action:



Now what is the difference between regions #1 and #2 in terms of determinism?

Region #2:

Within this region, within the region of the physical universe, actions bound by the laws of nature, actions which are subject to the laws of nature, actions observed and measured through the fields of science: physics, genetics, chemistry, etc.

Within this region, free will may operate but it does not operate unaffected by the laws of nature.

Region #1;

Within this region, within the region of pure abstraction, actions bound by the laws of nature are not found. As such, entities found within this region have a much greater degree of potential acts they can perform but the trade off is: They are unable to experience originally. Even though free will exists within this region, no unique, no original change takes place because unique change is a function of time and time is a function of the sub-entities rather than being a function of the whole.

In this section of the tractate, we have been giving a cursory examination to the concepts of divine foreknowledge, pre-destination, predestination, and determinism. One should note, that the concept of free will has now been added to the equation. What of free will, does it change in terms of a new perception as opposed to present day perception? Absolutely, a perceptual change in our understanding of free will is where the heart and soul of this tractate lies. The understanding of a concept such as free will cannot be expressed in a paragraph but rather takes a complete tractate to accomplish. The totality of this tractate is where a new understanding of free will lies.

With this in mind, we need to examine the concept of free will in detail. Before we do, however, lets examine the concept of determinism in a little more detail.

Internationality: the need for a location of determinism
Actions bound by the laws of determinism: What has been

Actions bound by the laws of determinism are active knowing actions taken by a knowing entity and are independent of the laws of nature. Actions of determinism are actions generated by a knowing entity whose intended actions are to over-ride actions of free will generated by a second knowing entity. Examples of actions bound by the laws of determinism are: I am, against my will, pushed off the cliff by an entity itself bound by the laws of free will.

Actions bound by the laws of determinism tend to establish gods and God. What is the difference between gods and God? gods are beings, physical essences, higher order beings while God is an abstractual essence, higher order Being.

beings versus Being, what is the difference? In the sense of the four actions identified by metaphysics, nothing.

However, isnt there a difference of degree? Actually, there is no difference of degree. The action of overriding the free will of an entity is the action of overriding the free will of an entity. Isnt there a form of overriding the free will of an entity, which the entity in turn can overcome? If the entity whose freewill is being overridden manages to overcome the action of gods or God and thus maintains its actions bound by the laws of free will, manages to maintain its desired course as originally intended, then its free will has not been overridden. As such, free will becomes the dominant action and determinism, although it remains an issue, becomes the recessive action.

Wouldnt an entity whose free will has been impacted by a god or God in an attempt to override the entitys free will, find its intended actions altered by those very attempts to override its initial actions in the first place? Certainly. Wouldnt such alterations be a form of overriding the purity of action attempted by the entity attempting to initiate actions bound by the laws of free will? Absolutely. The degree of purity initiated by entities attempting to maintain their free will as well as the purity of actions initiated by entities of free will is not the issue here. Such concepts are discussions regarding what we call principles and issues regarding standing up for ones principles.

With this having been said, we can now examine what actions bound by the laws of determinism really are. Such an examination brings us back to the four forms of action:

  1. The state of being
  2. Actions bound by the laws of nature
  3. Actions bound by the laws of free will
  4. Actins bound by the laws of determinism

Do not loose sight of the fact that within this tractate, the order given for the four forms of action in no way implies relative significance of one form of action over another. It may be too difficult to subconsciously overlook such a natural tendency without a little help. To assist us in recognizing the equality regarding all forms of action, lets restate the four forms of action and then proceed:

  1. Actins bound by the laws of determinism
  2. Actions bound by the laws of nature
  3. The state of being
  4. Actions bound by the laws of free will

Through the aid of the concept of location, we can begin to examine the four forms of action:



With this diagram in mind, lets re-categorize our four forms of action:

Forms of determinism:

    1. Actions bound by the laws of nature

    2. Actions bound by the laws of determinism

    3. States of being

Forms of free will:

    4. Actions bound by the laws of free will

We have little difficulty acknowledging the state of being exists.

We have little difficulty acknowledging, actions bound by the laws of nature exist.

We have little difficulty acknowledging, actions bound by the laws of determinism exist.

We do, however, have a problem understanding forms of free will. For the time being, we are going to set free will aside and focus upon the other three forms of action.

As such our previous diagram now becomes:



Earthquakes, volcanoes, waves, wind, starlight, gravitational pull, etc. are all forms actions bound by the laws of nature. These actions are, in present day society, perceived as neutral actions but actions nevertheless. They are perceived as actions, which affect entities of knowing. For the most part, however, they are actions whose pre-existing laws we, entities of knowing, find affecting ourselves in a neutral manner. These forms of actions originate in response to the laws of nature and are not initiated in a conscious manner planned by the natural entity of the mountain, the star, the ocean, the atmosphere.

I am, you are, the mountain is, the lake is, the house is, the tree is, etc, are all forms of actions represented by the passive action: the state of being. These actions are in present day society, perceived as neutral actions but actions nevertheless. They are perceived as actions, which effect entities of knowing, but for the most part, are actions whose pre-existing laws we exist within rather than being actions unit entities intentionally, knowingly, willingly, and consciously initiate in a physical sense.

Murder, rape, verbal-abuse, genocide, physical assault, etc are, from the perspective of the victum, all forms of actions bound by the laws of determinism since the actions are not controlled by the victim. These action, are in present day society, perceived as aggressive actions, forms of action. They are perceived as actions, which affect entities of knowing. Such actions are actions the entity does not wish to have forced upon it. In the pragmatic sense, there is little arguing such actions occur within the physical, but what of such actions existing outside the physical? Outside the physical actions bound by the laws of determinism do not exist for to exist and be effective in an affective manner actions bound by the laws of determinism must have a medium of action. Such a median is the physical itself. Without the physical, abstraction as well as any entity of pure abstractual existence need not submit to unsolicited actions of other purely abstractual existence.

With this in mind, we can examine the concept of divine foreknowledge as the ultimate form of action bound by the laws of determinism. Abstractual existence is what determinism lies within and the abstract is the means and the location within which established consciousness, being itself, exists timelessly and within which established consciousness, being, understands its very timelessness.

When observing human behavior and interactions, it becomes obvious where free will does not lie. While free will may lie not only within actions bound by the laws of nature, and within actions bound by the laws of determinism, and within actions bound as states of being, free will in the purest sense lies within itself, within the entity itself.

With this in mind, we come to the concept of free will itself:

Potentiality: the need for a location of free will
It is the entity, which performs the action not the region. Thus, the previous diagram needs to be expanded to include entities within the abstract, to include units of knowing of what is uniquely perceived and uniquely experienced. As such, the diagram becomes:



Now we are ready to discuss the issue of free will and determinism existing simultaneously in two versus one location.

The potential to be, action bound by the laws of free will, tends to establish self preservation as the ultimate form of action since the physical existence is what free will lies within and since the physical is the means by which and the location within which virgin consciousness, being itself, emerges and expands its very self.

Action bound by the laws of free will is not an absolute, rather action bund by the laws of free will are actions that we perceive to be occurring:

Perceive to be occurring:

    a. Perceive: active
    b. to be: passive
    c. occurring: active

This state, the passive sandwiched between states of the active, replicates a dynamic metaphysical systems as opposed to static metaphysical systems

Dynamic metaphysical system: being being Being



So why is this a dynamic metaphysical system? It is dynamic because it provides a means for growth. All is known except what is to be.

Static metaphysical system:



So why is this a static metaphysical system? It is static because it provides no means for growth. All is known.

With this in mind, once again we come back to:



We will now dissolve the confinement of the border in order to remove the confusion of oil having an affinity to its container. As such, we obtain



We then create a system by adding a boundary, which has no affinity for either oil or water. We do so simply for convenience. We thus obtain:



We then call oil by its correct symbolic name and do the same for water.



We then simplify using Ockhams razor:



If we then create a location for free will to function within a realm of space and time, we then obtain



Once again we come back to the model of being being Being.

Nothing: the need for a location of nothing
We have discussed the concepts regarding the existence of free will and the existence of divine foreknowledge. We have discussed the concepts regarding a location for free will and a location for divine foreknowledge. The natural extension of such dialectic would appear to move into the direction of examining the existence of nothingness and the location for nothingness.

To move into the direction of such a discussion, however, would deprive us of completing the task at hand. The task at hand is finalizing our understanding as to how we can reasonably and rationally resolve the paradox regarding the simultaneous existence of free will and divine foreknowledge.

The issue regarding nothingness is extremely important and is not to be ignored. As such, the examination of nothingness will be examined in the Tractate 4: Copernicus. Why discuss the issue of nothingness within the Tractate 4: Copernicus? We will examine the concept of nothingness within the Copernicus Tractate because it is Copernicus who unwittingly led us away from understanding nothingness itself.

The Book of Divine Foreknowledge:
Boethius system introduces us to the Book of Divine Foreknowledge:

Hidden deep within the Book is free will



Within the book, one is free to make choices of their own preference but the choices are already known by the ultimate Knowing, known by Omniscience.

Religions would suggest the book is a form of encyclopedia of the whole; the book is a source of all knowledge.

If the book is a source of all knowledge, then Boethius is correct in his assumptions regarding the limits of men. If such is the case, then humanity can perceive of paradoxes whose solutions will never be know to humanity due to the limits placed upon humanity not by itself but rather due to limits placed upon humanity by a superior Being.

If we find a means of resolving the contradicting paradox regarding the simultaneous existence of divine foreknowledge and free will, then we will, for the present, have removed the limits humanity places upon itself. If we can find an alternative solution to Boethius principle relegating humanity to a limited status, then we will be ready to move on and free philosophy and metaphysics of its present constraints, thus opening the doors of not only truly new and exciting philosophical and metaphysical perceptual developments but we will have opened the doors of truly new and exciting cosmological and ontological perceptual developments as well.

This then leaves us with discussing the remaining two possibilities:

Which came first the chicken or the egg?

Which came first determinism or free will?

This question is very similar to the question, which surfaced in Tractate 1: Zeno and Seamlessness. In this Tractate, the question arose: Does the abstract exist within the physical or does the physical exist within the abstract?

The Location of Free Will:
Perceived free will located within the physical:

We understand free will to apply to active forms of actions. Previously we categorized actions into two forms:

Forms of action:

    Passive:

    1. State of being
    2. Actions bound by the laws of nature

    Active:

    3. Actions bound by the laws of free will
    4. Actions bound by the laws of determinism

Since the two forms of actions: states of being and actions bound by the laws of nature are actions we do not perceive as being actions generated by forms of consciousness, we will set them aside and concentrate upon the other forms of action, free will and determinism.

Free will within the physical:



And it is within the physical we perceive abstraction to exist. Love, hate, jealousy, joy, awe, inspiration, knowledge, consciousness of consciousness, .

But what of:

Free will within the abstract

Since free will is an abstract concept we will use the same geometric configuration to represent abstraction:



If free will is to be free will, the individual must be the individual and as such, multiplicity becomes:



So it is, we come back again to the whole being the sum of its parts yet being the whole, having its own distinct identity. Thus giving rise, once again, to our understanding that in this type of metaphysical perception the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.

The parts are original entities of knowing having experienced originally within the physical. As such, it is more accurate to portray the latter diagram as:



Where then is free will found in relation to the physical? It is found within the physical just as it is found within the abstract. As such, we obtain:



And what of the passive actions categorized as: states of being? These actions are represented by the black boundary lines of the three forms of action symbolized by the small square, the circle, and the large rectangle.

The location of Determinism:
The large rectangle:

The latter diagram defines the location of determinism. Determinism is found in the whole, the large rectangle.

Entities of knowing can travel within the whole as they so choose and experience everything including all abstractions they so desire to experience for they are no longer confined by the restraints of time and distance. Knowing of all entities is open to all to experience for the abstract cannot be hidden from the abstract.

The whole is the whole and is knowing of its wholeness. So it is the whole is the sum of all its parts in addition to being an entity in and of itself.

The whole grows with the growth of virgin knowing and this new knowing adds to the whole.

Sequentiality is not an issue of the whole, for sequentiality is a function of time and distance and since time and distance are not an innate characteristic of the whole of abstraction, ordinal sequentiality are not innate characteristics of the whole.

Both the whole and the individual entities of knowing are incapable of awareness of what is not and what is not is what virgin knowing is to become through free will.

The circle:

The latter diagram defines the location of determinism. Determinism is found in the physical, the circle, both through actions bound by the laws of nature and actions bound by the laws of determinism.

The square:

The latter diagram defines the location where determinism is not. Determinism is not found in the square. Determinism is not found within free will.

The misnomer of free will



If free will was established as action independent the action of determinism then is free will really free will or just another form of determinism? If such were the case, then free will would have been established by determinism and thus free will would have been established through the act of determinism. If free will is found within determinism then was free will established after the fact of determinisms existence?

On the other hand, perhaps free will void determinism initiated determinism. Perhaps determinism was established as a storage location for free will.

At this point in time, it cannot be determined which of the two, free will or determinism, came first. Nor would it seem, are we capable of determining if neither is the case. We are presently incapable of determining if one came before the other or if the two came into existence simultaneously.

In actuality, the three options regarding which came first, free will, determinism, or both simultaneously, are not as impossible to discuss as one might think.

The third choice:

    Simultaneous emergence of free will and determinism would suggest an existence before either form of active action, determinism or free will, existed. But is it possible for there to be a from of action, other than either passive action or active action. Is it possible for there to be a form of action other than the four forms of action we discussed: States of being, actions bound by the laws of nature, actions bound by the laws of determinism, and actions bound by the laws of free will?

    If one wishes to proceed with such an argument one must be able to describe such action in order for this dialectic to proceed. . In the absence of such a description, we will let the possibility of such a possibility stand but we will ignore the dialectic of such a possibility until the description of some form of action, other than passive or active action, emerges. Having set such a possibility aside, we should then proceed with the dialectic

A point of information: This work regarding The War and Peace of a New Metaphysical Perception will not ignore the argument: what came before free will and determinism. The immersion into this very concept initiates the totality of the last chapter: Chapter 18: The End of the Beginning Theoretical Metaphysics.

This then leaves us with discussing the remaining two possibilities:

Which came first the chicken or the egg?

Which came first determinism or free will?

This question is, in essence, no different from the question, which surfaced in Tractate 1: Zeno and Seamlessness. In this Tractate, the question arose: Does the abstract exist within the physical or does the physical exist within the abstract? One may refer to Tractate 1 if one chooses but rather than reiterate what came before, it is time to begin to address a summary of the issue of free will versus determinism.

It appears an extraordinary number of concepts will be addressed in the manner of refer to what was previously or addressed as later we will. Unfortunately, this is a correct observation. Space and time are both limited by the concept known as a Tractate. It is the concept of space and time, which confines us to the parameter of limited discussions. It is the concept of tractate, which limits us to staying on task rather than chaotically diverting our attention away from the discussion at hand, which is understanding how it is we became confined, caged, in the first place. It is only through understanding the concept of how it is we are caged by limitations of creative understanding, that we can begin to explore the means of unlocking the door of our cage and stepping out into the realm of free space once again.

Part of unlocking the door to this cage of philosophical confinement lies in exploding the perception of Boethius:

    It is not allowed to man to comprehend in thought all the ways of the divine work. (Boethius: The Consolation of Philosophy, IV, 6)

Perceptions generated by Boethius lead to slamming shut the doors of perceptual knowing and locking it shut. Free will lies behind the door labled: It is not for us to know.lead to multiple perceptions such as: If man were intended to fly, God would have given him wings.

The misnomer regarding free will lies in the perception : Some people think free will is never interrupted or superceded. But as we have seen, there are two forms of action which often interfere with free will:

    1. Action bound by the laws of nature

    2. Actions bound by the laws of determinism

Actions bound by the laws of nature often supercede the desire to accomplish the actions bound by the laws of free will.

Actions bound by the laws of determinism often supercede the desire to accomplish actions bound by the laws of free will.

The ultimate extreme of both forms of action, actions bound by the laws of nature and actions bound by the laws of determinism, is exemplified as action which terminates actions bound by the laws of free will found within individual entities existing through action bound by the laws of the state of being.

Letting go
It is time for us to let go of Boethius metaphysical system. Previously we could not let go of Boethius perceptions because we had nothing to fill the vacuum letting go would create. We could not let go of the concept:

    The point of greatest importance here is this: the superior manner of knowledge includes the inferior, but it is quite impossible for the inferior to rise to the superior.

It is now time to let go of such perceptions. We have an alternative set before us regarding a perception of free will and determinism. We have an alternative which provides the means of letting go the concept that it is humanity who defines what it is we cannot know. It is time to file Boethius concept regarding the limits of humanity, the limits of beings found within the universe, away as a part of the annals of history:

We come to the first paragraph of this Tractate:

Free will confined within the boundaries of determinism is simply an illusion of free will.

    There can be little question that Boethius, more than any other philosophic author, helped the great Schoolmen to retain a general comprehensive view of the world as a whole, in spite of the distractions of their minute inquiries. (Boethius, The Consolation of Philosophy, Penguin Books, 1969, England, Victor Watts, Merton College, Oxford.)

At this point in time, philosophers have not resolved the issue. On the other hand, at this point in time, philosophers have refused to embrace the rationality of a whole enveloping the physical. As time has demonstrated, two and a half millennium of time, we cannot resolve some of our greatest philosophical paradoxes without the use of both the rationality and the reasonableness of such concept.

Until philosophy moves to the level of accepting its primary tool, reason, as being itself a legitimate tool , the paradoxes will remain paradoxes. Is the lack of being able to resolve the major paradoxes addressed within the Tractates of the work, The War and Peach of a New Metaphysical Perception, a negative? It is only a negative if one believes stagnation is a negative.
Why is it a negative action to take the position: It is unimportant to resolve the issue of free will versus divine foreknowledge. Why is clinging to the concept that the relationship between free will and divine foreknowledge found within Boethius paradox a negative? Why is refusing to face perhaps one of the most influential paradoxes to confront us for the last twenty-five hundred years a potential negative? The answer to all these questions lies in our abhorrence toward the concept that we are a stagnant specie.

We have addressed three forms of paradoxes: Tractate 1: seamlessness versus multiplicity, Tractate 2: one first truth versus multiple first truths, and now Tractate 3: free will versus divine foreknowledge. In each instance it has been argued that we can resolve the paradox through themeans of expanding our perceptual understanding reason, metaphysics, philosophy, can provide.

In the past, we have been unable to resolve many philosophical paradoxes because the greatest paradoxes deal with abstractions and abstractions are not physical in nature. As such, these paradoxes are not measurable for they are not items characterized by time and space.

Abstractions are capable of comprehending time and space but time and space are not capable of comprehending abstractions.

To resolve abstractual paradoxes embracing characteristics of time and space, one presently has only the tool of reason at ones disposal.

Until we resolve the major paradoxes encompassing the interrelationships of the abstractual and the physical, the paradoxes will remain. The negative aspect of a state of stagnation is the state within which such a state leaves us, units of knowing. We remain mired at an established level of understanding.

Are there other levels of understanding awaiting us? Indubitably, and we, you and I, you and I together, will be left wanting in terms of rising to this new level of understanding until we find the means of resolving the primitive paradoxes presently facing us.

So what next? One thing is certain; we have not come to the end of our understanding regarding the issues of great paradoxes facing humanity. Our next step is to step out beyond the issue of space itself.

It must be stated at this point that such a statement is a misconception for we cannot step out beyond a region of infinite space. As we shall see in Tractate 4: Copernicus, we can only step into a realm of infinite space and as we shall see, it is only by confining ourselves that we can free ourselves of confinement.

So it is free will may very well not be found within the System but rather free will may very well be found within a system itself contained within a greater System.

Are we creating a paradox? It is only a paradox if one does not understand the solution to the paradox Copernicus espoused the paradox of Centricism versus non-Centricism.

We now understand that:
Boethius is a vital link in moving our perceptual understanding forward regarding the system being filled with determinism, into that of being the system filled with both determinism and free will. As such, both free will and determinism, with the help of Boethius, now have a location within which each dominates. As such, the understanding regarding the role of free will and determinism as well as the understanding regarding the interrelationship between free will and determinism no longer remain in a state of confusion. Even more interestingly, the existence of such an interrelationship is not only recognized as a significant aspect of the larger system but it is now understood how free will and determinism interact one with the other